Thursday, November 6, 2014

Paper 3 [Two Paragraphs Flushed Out (Intro and Paragraph 2)]

Gerald Lappay

RWS 100

Professor Werry

November 6, 2014

[Insert Title Later]

            The internet can be considered the printing press of our generation. Like the printing press, there were skeptics and advocates – each with their own beliefs that the invention could help or hurt the future. If Clive Thompson, writer of “Smarter Than You Think: How Technology is Changing Our Lives for the Better”, can considered an internet advocate -- then Nicholas Carr, writer of the book “The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains” and The Atlantic Article “Is Google Making Us Stupid? (Alternatively, “Is Google Making Us Stoopid?)” can be considered an internet skeptic. Carr, who studied at prestigious higher-education institutes such as Dartmouth and Harvard, is one of the big-names of internet skeptics. Both his book and The Atlantic article have been wide topics of discussion regarding the internet’s impact on this generation. While he commends the internet for its wide variety of uses, he also criticizes it for its harmful effects – provided one uses it for a long period of time. These harmful effects aren’t life-threatening. According to Carr, the internet impairs ones cognitive ability, and other quality-of-life functions; and in order to make his case, Carr uses several rhetorical strategies ranging from events in history to personal accounts. In this piece, I will analyze Carr’s Atlantic article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” for strategies he uses to persuade his readers.
            About three-quarters into “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, Carr begins to address his skeptics. “Yes, you should be skeptical of my skepticism … the Net isn’t the alphabet, and although it may replace the printing press, it produces something altogether different” (Carr). Besides directly addressing his skeptics, Carr conveys his emotions to the reader in different ways. Particularly, he compares his feelings towards the internet to that of the 1960’s “classic” 2001: Space Odyssey. Carr claims that his frequent use of the internet messes up his brain how Dave messed up HAL’s circuitry, ultimately shutting HAL down. “ Carr uses 2001: Space Odyssey in both his opening and closing. This could refer to the Aristotelian appeal to Pathos – the way a writer conveys his/her feelings to get a point across to the reader. While several appeals to pathos are present in “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, the pathos appeals via 2001: Space Odyssey are quite hard to miss, since they’re very prevalent in this article. While I’m relatively uncultured when it comes to movies from the 1960s, I’m certain that these appeals to pathos are quite effective when it comes to reaching to the reader. In a way, the reader understands Carr’s feelings and sympathizes with them – to an extent. If I knew more about this film, chances are I would sympathize with Carr’s feelings even more.
            Carr spends a few paragraphs on Nietzsche, a German philosopher whose ideals were adopted by the Nazi regime. In Nietzsche’s time [the 1860s], the typewriter was a relatively new invention. Nietzsche struggled with hand cramps, and as such adopted the typewriter as his new medium to continue publishing philosophical texts.
                        But the machine had a subtler effect on his work. One of Nietzsche’s friends, a                             composer, noticed a change in the style of his writing. His already terse prose had                          become even tighter, more telegraphic. “Perhaps you will through this instrument                            even take to a new idiom,” the friend wrote in a letter, noting that, in his own                            work, his “‘thoughts’ in music and language often depend on the quality of pen                            and paper” (Carr).

Carr denotes the changes in Nietzsche’s writing style, all because of the change to a new piece of technology. While it helped Nietzsche to write again, it also hurt his writing style. Carr’s purpose in identifying Nietzsche and his typewriter issues was to 1) connect the typewriter to the internet, as both were relatively new technology in their respective times and 2) show the reader that the internet wasn’t the only piece of technology to affect function.

No comments:

Post a Comment